One Good Thing

  • It was July 1957 in Liverpool, England a nearly 17-year-old John Lennon was impressed by the just 15-years-old Paul McCartney's ability to play Eddie Cochran's Twenty Flight Rock on the guitar when they met at a church garden fete. The good impression that McCartney's performance of the song made on Lennon, led to him inviting McCartney to join The Quarrymen, the band that eventually evolved into The Beatles. McCartney later was quoted: "I think what impressed him most was that I knew all the words."

January 07, 2008

Radiohead Name Your Own Price... Returns

The possibility to pick your own price for any version of Radiohead's In Rainbows physical or digital release has returned. TBD Records, an offshoot the Dave Mathew's owned ATO label which is owned by Sony/BMG has so many price points for this record if I was a retailer I would be pretty pissed and as a consumer very confused.



TBD Records has mySpace banner ad's that link to directly to the TBD Records Radiohead website. From their you can pick to shoot off to iTunes late-night dollar menu or link to Amazon.

As you can see from the screenshot above, currently you can purchase the physical record new for $7.99. If you change your mind and want an mp3 (and do not care for iTunes or never saw that link a few pages back) you can buy it direct from Amazon as a digital download for $7.99.

If you really hard-pressed you can pick the price of... oh say... $6.99. For $6.99 you can purchase via Amazon store's a used copy of In Rainbows for that "pick your own price" that you kinda picked.

Now, Wal*Mart's price is currently $11.88

When has Wal*Mart been undercut on anything... ever?

And by nearly 30% at that vs. other retail and digital outlets!

But, again, if you want to pick the price of $11.88 -- you can do that. On this more than confusing day to buy a simple record, you can pretty much still get In Rainbows for any price you wish to pay it seems.


January 05, 2008

Leave it to Trent Reznor to move the discussion forward...

The backstory: Saul Williams cd called NiggyTardust! is a 100% independent release and 100% free of any corporate support or traditional corporate record industry involvement. It was produced and partially (or fully?) funded by Trent Reznor of Nine Inch Nails...

Text below reprinted from Nine Inch Nail's Website on 01.03.08 regarding the COMPLETE AND FULL DISCLOSURE OF THE SALES FIGURES for giving away SAUL WILLIAMS NIGGY STARDUST record:

Trent Reznor speaks: 03 January 2008: saul follow-up and facts

It's a strange time to be an artist in the recording business. It's pretty easy to see what NOT to do these days, but less obvious to know what's right. As I find myself free from the bloated bureaucracy of major labels, finally able to do whatever I want... well, what is that? What is the "right" way to release records, treat your music and your audience with respect and attempt to make a living as well? I have a number of musician friends who are either in a similar situation or feel they soon will be, and it's a real source of anxiety and uncertainty.

I'd like to share my experience releasing Saul Williams' "The Inevitable Rise and Liberation of NiggyTardust" and what I've learned from the process. Perhaps by revealing of all our data - our "dirty laundry" - we can contribute to a better solution.

A quick history: Saul makes a great record that I produce. We can't find the right home at a major label. We decide to release it ourselves, digitally. Saul does not have limitless financial resources so we shop around for a company that can fulfill our needs. We choose Musicane because they are competent and are willing to adapt to what we want. The results are here: niggytardust.com

We offer the entire record free (as in totally free to the visitor - we pay bandwidth costs) as 192 MP3s, or for $5 you can choose higher fidelity versions and feel good about supporting the artist directly. We offer all major CCs and PayPal as payment options.

Here's what I was thinking: Fans are interested in music as soon as it's available (that's a good thing, remember) and usually that's a leak from the label's manufacturing plants. Offering the record digitally as its first appearance in the marketplace eliminates that problem. I thought if you offered the whole record free at reasonable quality - no strings attached - and offered a hassle free way to show support that clearly goes straight to the artists who made it at an unquestionably low price people would "do the right thing". I know, I know...

Well, now I DO know and you will too.

Saul's previous record was released in 2004 and has sold 33,897 copies.

As of 1/2/08,
154,449 people chose to download Saul's new record.
28,322 of those people chose to pay $5 for it, meaning:
18.3% chose to pay.

Of those paying,

3,220 chose 192kbps MP3
19,764 chose 320kbps MP3
5,338 chose FLAC

Keep in mind not one cent was spent on marketing this record. The only marketing was Saul and myself talking as loudly as we could to anybody that would listen.

If 33,897 people went out and bought Saul's last record 3 years ago (when more people bought CDs) and over 150K - five times as many - sought out this new record, that's great - right?

I have to assume the people knowing about this project must either be primarily Saul or NIN fans, as there was very little media coverage outside our direct influence. If that assumption is correct - that most of the people that chose to download Saul's record came from his or my own fan-base - is it good news that less than one in five feel it was worth $5? I'm not sure what I was expecting but that percentage - primarily from fans - seems disheartening.

Add to that: we spent too much (correction, I spent too much) making the record utilizing an A-list team and studio, Musicane fees, an old publishing deal, sample clearance fees, paying to give the record away (bandwidth costs), and nobody's getting rich off this project.

But...
Saul's music is in more peoples' iPods than ever before and people are interested in him. He'll be touring throughout the year and we will continue to get the word out however we can.

So - if you're an artist looking to utilize this method of distribution, make of these figures what you will and hopefully this info is enlightening.

Best,
TR

 

January 04, 2008

Why is the corporate control of music something to care about still in 2008?

Why is the corporate control of music something to care about still in 2008?



Because for the same reasons government and corporate dictated regimes have a hold (still) of Darfur in 2008. Look what that has done to create one of largest human atrocities of modern times.

This is personal, cause it takes very little to care. Music saves peoples lives.Things like presidential elections do not. Yet, look what sops up most of our time each day.

Love and heart and the passion to amp things up...to get people to take notice is what will continue to happen for the forseeable future around the state of music... as this is what happens on most topics that matter and that one way or another impact the quality and abundance in our lives.

Why music? Why is it that important? Because music breaks boundaries and closes divides... it speaks beyond the words and our native language(s) that ultimately constrain us from understanding others. If you magnify upon it even closer --- music is peace... and it can stop forces and be the greatest of white flags to serve as a barricade from aggressors... it along with flowers are not only great signs of beauty, but clearly of peace.

If what I speak in this blog is perceived as attacks on someone...then it is all the other noise going on around them that keeps them in the darkness of taking these things for granted and assuming all will be well... as I have very little to do with the real outcomes... or do we?

Yes, the universe will take care of everything...Darfur, or poverty, or the presidential election... it has already been worked out by the Universe... I agree. So, what do we do? Just not care or pay as little attention as possible?

It amazes me how we can have such blindness to just simply choose to care. Usually, we don't do anything about something that actually matters to us or start paying attention until we start losing it. And, if the things that mattered to us were begun to be taken away... your life, my life, others lives would be drastically different... it is all very simple. And it all starts with being sympathetic to others and caring about what might just be important to them for the sake of doing what is right. I know... we each don't have time for yet another cause.

But, if you lost your hearing... your life would be different... If we lost Radiohead or music or the sound of music... our lives would be different... Those are facts. And it would hurt.

It's been documented many times through words and stories shared that many people who have struggled to survive in life - not only survived but prospered because of music. Yes, saved by music of all kinds and forms... many would go on record as saying "music saved their lives". I would venture to say its more a norm than not.

So, if the ability of all forms and genres and sub-genres and new genres of music are bottle-necked cause of old man-made corporate ways or commercial barricades...and we are limited to the options being Josh Groban or Josh Groban... then I don't want any part in that man-made manufactured reality... nor will I stand for it... nor should anyone else.

But, awareness and choice... is all we have. And the equality in giving artists the ability to self-sustain themselves no matter who they are should be considered as important as what we each take from music.

We love to take... we love to take every last bit until something is nearly all gone... especially in this country...

The rub for me is people's blindness and ability to just take what they are sold via corporate channels of music cause its perceived as a mere entertainment... or profit... and somehow... its okay to make music just a profit driven business... I guess because we have been birthed into believing this by and large... that is all it is... "music as entertainment".

I have news for people... go and test the waters... ask 10 people that you care about... ask them how music has mattered to them... on any level...

Trust me, the aggregate response will be...they couldn't imagine life without it... Now, let me allow you to connect the dots yourselves...

GOOGLE this: "2007 Copyright Royalty Board internet radio"

Look at the first entry or any one of them.

At the heart of this whole matter with Radiohead is the corporate controlling structures they remain in bed with. Namely the largest corporate music litigators - the RIAA (mind you lobbiests, lobby; litigators sue the parents and their kids who took some music off the Internet or otherwise distributed it). So, do not attempt to believe the RIAA are some fair little organization that just politefully talks about their corporate supporters interests... they ultimately sued little kids...

The RIAA is trying to contain control of what will end up being the re-birth of pirate radio most likely in 2008... and what is the point or problem with all that?

As we sit here something we and many young folks have grown up with aka "Internet Radio" is already closing down...
all because people do not care or do not keep up with and are not aware of what is happening in the big old "music world"...

Internet Radio has essentially been put on... DEATH ROW... by Radiohead's corporate bedmates! And this after all they have had to deal with during their last corporate slavehood with EMI. Seemingly, Radiohead is ok with continuing to sleep with someone who is fucking everybody else.

Write Tim Westergren at Pandora Radio and ask what our government and the RIAA corporate structures (major and mini major labels) are doing to what is a fair and legitimate business model. A business that criss-crosses boundaries leveraging the true power of the Internet - to deliver music and sound to far off lands without any new infrastructure or new controlling entities. The brilliance of Internet Radio is it hits all the places otherwise would not have the choices we all take for granted in terms of content or access to the content we really want. And, it's being shutdown as I type, it already started last year in many European countries.

So, tell me again how not caring and not considering and not asking questions around the state of music or of even our most celebrated and loved artists like Radiohead is less than appropriate for everyone given music has saved many of our lives?

If it takes a village to move a mountain... Radiohead could of delivered an entire metropolis to the digging site in spades... the sheer magnitude of Radiohead and the opportunity they were presented with... in no longer having the shackles around their ankles from a slave labor contract with EMI and them being on the cusp of launching a much heralded record...

Radiohead could of been the inflection point that caused the corporate towers to crumble, they could of built the entire village or gotten key investors like Branson to build it... they fucking didn't even need to use any of their own capital! Why now? Because the corporate structures are at the weakest point they have ever been at... and it would of been time finally that the corporate structures (labels, distribution, retail lock ups, RIAA) were the ones on an official "death watch".

Instead, directly and indirectly, Radiohead is still assisting the death of Internet Radio and pretty much the opportunity that exists in 2008 for any artist to boldly rise up in a less "controlled by a few" independent global music community...

In training my dog, what works is strong gestures by me to him to get him to learn. Yelling or hitting doesn't work. Shaking Thom Yorke really hard wouldn't work. Shaking and hitting and yelling aren't really successful "gestures" to create the awareness that would allow my dog's growth to take place and get him to learn. My common gesture is to hold my dog by his nose and hold him for 10-15 seconds and convey the feeling of "no" to him. I can't even just say "no" --- he doesn't really understand "no". But, the feeling or energy I give off during the 10-15 second hold - he gets the message.

So, to Thom Yorke and all those that choose to remain unaware and uncaring to the situations facing something that matters to you - may this blog grab you by the nose and allow the feeling to sink in - "no, this is not right". Because if I sat and coddled my dog all day and tried to have a nice little discussion with him he would just continue pissing in the house everywhere.

January 03, 2008

RIAA Soundscan Report/Wal*Mart Stock Report for 01.03.08

RIAA Soundscan Report for 01.03.08"



The RIAA Soundscan Report for 01.03.08 shows, yep, plenty of copies of In Rainbows available at Wal*Mart. We will keep you posted.

Some Wal*Mart buying tips to my Radiohead funny monkeys...

1. Don't forget the $11.88 is a fixed price. Haggling or negiotiating price or attempting to forcibily name your own at the checkout register might give in-store security the opportunity to go ape-shit on some punk kid.

2. Try and be friendly to the fucking greeter on your way in. Grumbling or mumbling something to them attempting to impersonate your alter-hero Thom Yorke is not respectful frankly of old people. And generally greeters are old retired folks. So, please be kind - one of them might be my dad.

3. Be thankful you are saving over $3.00, but please do not draw attention to this fact, just get your crack, pay the girl at the register, and try and walk out appearing to be un-aimless. The only thing bigger than Wal*Mart is Google and the only thing bigger than Google is the FTC. And just who ate the
$3.10 (21% discount) or what they got in return sometimes is a small bone the pesky FTC likes to pick especially around the selling of corporate records (the thing you are holding in your hand) in retail stores.

Anyhow, ahhh, the joys of big corporate record sales and the retail back office dealings of cooperative advertising allowances that I can only imagine the FTC never ever gets to hear about. So, shhh, I won't say anything if you don't.

Enjoy your Wal*Mart corporate rock my funny Radiohead monkeys :-)

January 02, 2008

iLooneyTunes sucks in Radiohead...

iLooneyTunes sucks in Radiohead...
"Da, Da, Da, De, De, De, Da-ats, All Folks!"




Radiohead's almightly In Rainbows digital record will be.... uh... released... again... digitally...on the Internet... digitally... again... via iLooneyTunes late-night dollar menu starting next Tuesday 01.08.08... digitally... Did I say that already?



The full digital album (no Mime hands will be needed to DIY assemble the bloody thing thank god!) will be downloadable or you can go a la carte and nab a single McDownload for .99 cents! The innovation is its being released officially legally twice... digitally. On the Internet... digitally.

I want to clarify the situation to my little Radiohead rabid-head monkeys. If you want to pay $1.83 and 1/3 cents a track, you can't. That's the innovation. Isn't it cool. Wow, those guys at Radiohead corporate HQ - what they do with the math and simplfying all the rounding we would be forced to do trying to come up with a different price versus what we paid the first time or again for the... um... digital version.

But, no matter, even if you say, "Ok Computer... make iLooneyTunes sell me a track for... 1.0101010101010101010101" iLooneyTunes will give you a sad Elmer Fudd face and say: "
That was an awfuwwy good try wabbit!! You woscoe!!"

Let me shed more light on this - I know it's hard to understand. Here are a few more examples of what won't work:

Say you want to pay .47 cents a track. You can't. Why? Because.



And, right, you little SuicideGirl jokesters, if you want to spend .69 cents a track or for the whole record, iLooneyTunes won't allow it. Even if the band is into it, iLooneyTunes won't allow it.

Maybe you can try getting two tracks at one time instead?




Mmmh that would be fun to try... and that is as innovative and adventurous as it gets apparently in 2008 for the Thom Yorke Radiohead corporate record digital sales machine...

They had choices. And, instead they passed and did nothing different with their iLooneyTunes deal except for most likely getting a better percentage of revenues they will take for each album and track download sale! 

But, it's fitting for them. Cause they maintain what they have been doing all along with the marketing and promotion of In Rainbows - sell a record the age old corporate way and attempt to appear as revolutionizing the industry by keeping their primary audience hooked and snowjobbed to virally feed the kool-aid to a new legion of mass-followers.



Sorry, for the graveness, but you each have the capacity to do something about something that actually does in fact save lives - "music".

You could start by questioning your leader's choices or be clear in knowing what they are really doing.

January 01, 2008

You want proof about iTunes and how it rips you off?

You want proof about iTunes and how it rips you off the artist? And how anyone who buys a single download from iTunes is still ripping off their beloved artists?



When Steve Jobs and Apple had to approach the solution of providing "content" to their new amazing little device, the iPod, they had very little imagination. As that time Apple's re-birth was being perceived as a specialized premium computer hardware designer and manufacturer, versus a content creator or service provider.

Apple makes and sell premium gadgets, that was their ONLY motivation with the iPod, too. Pitch to Apple boardmembers: "We will sell lots of these little iPod devices, cheaply made overseas, integrating pieces parts from other companies, that are well-designed bling and would fit into a new trendy lifestyle and change behavior and use."

But, without content -- Apple's iPod would be foiled and left as some little device that came out and disappeared and essentially commoditized (by the competition - think APPLE NEWTON) never causing any shift in people's music listening and ownership behaviors and causing very whiny and pouty Apple boardmembers. But, someone had an idea.

So, unimaginatively, Apple went and talked to the mighty stalwart content owners, the ones that owned content that clearly people still wanted to listen to and would want far into the future. For Apple, this would force a competitive block at least for a short amount of time... and allow them to get a behavioral shift underway aka "people cherishing their iPods and ripping every god-damn song off of every cd they owned onto it". Talk about a brilliant strategy - who would ever leave the iPod then? If each consumer ripped their entire collection to it - they would never jump to a competitive product regardless of content choices!

But, Apple didn't stop there. So, they went to these content owners (about 5 or 6 globally in total) that owned the full 100% copyrights to all the major recordings of our time (nearly). But, to get a deal done fast that looked great for everyone (never considering:
independent music or artists or artists that hadn't even begun to be artists or bands)... Apple said to these 5 or 6 major content owners: "We can just work with all your old royalty deals. We do not need to change a thing. Or upset that pesky artist apple cart." 

The majority of all recorded music from those 5 or 6 content owners minus a few bands (think Beatles) that had some control over their digital futures - made iTunes possible, which gave the iPod its next great positioning to unassuming consumers and the unaware and create a stranglehold that will be hard to dislodge at this point. Bad deals and ideas from the past carried forward atop the iTunes/iPod platform for another 20 or 30 years? Fuck.

So, all this cause on one fine day at Apple someone had a slightly bad latte most likely and couldn't muster up a teensy bit more imaginatiion. Surely, the major content holders, who are all apart of the RIAA, who were suffering from Napsteritis and a case of boneheaditis around what to do to stop "DIGITAL" distribution saw this as a stop gap measure - being the limited thinkers they are. Did these content owners ever successfully stop cassette mix tapes? No.

More imagination or a thought to include all artists in a way that could allow them the benefit of easy digital distribution in a single place (like iTunes) -and- allow a new type of "royalty" deal that would allow small or unknown or new artists to take the majority or larger portion of a single track sale or full album download sale - and - therefore allow a dedicated artist musician or singer/songwriter or band to launch themselves into a sustainable creative force with independence, yet a top the iTunes/iPod platform. Boy, that woulda really been great, somehow. Like the mouse. Or the graphical user interface. Imagine if we were all still using command line prompts on the computer? Boy, thanks Apple.


WANT PROOF? And I quote David Byrne (
from Wired Magazine: Issue 16.01):

So what happens when online sales eliminate many of these expenses? Look at iTunes: $10 for a "CD" download reflects the cost savings of digital distribution, which seems fair — at first. It's certainly better for consumers. But after Apple takes its 30 percent, the royalty percentage is applied [from the old slavery deals between the major content owners and artists] the artist — surprise! — is no better off.

His words not mine. David Byrne is a former member of a little band called the Talking Heads, a former label owner and solo performer who makes music to perform and sell.

What is funny about the article by David Byrne in Wired is he uses a $13.99 price point for the entire article and then without much mention, he switches to being ok with a $10 a cd price point. A price point instigated by Apple's amazing math machine and cost dismantling based on what they could cheapen out (cause digital distribution is cheaper... I guess by a whole $4 per unit cheaper!).

That is the touche here frankly, in all of this all artists works were reduced to a value of .99 cents a song, no matter how many people buy it, and without care of what the perceived value of the song is to individuals or the universe.

Imagine if you all had said to Apple: "Ehhhh, yeah, this iPod thing is worth about $14 dollars. Parts $4, Malaysian labor $1.13, Ammortized r&d costs $3.75, ammortized cost of lattes with extra foam drank during design about $2.82. What is that? Like $13 bucks, fuck, whatever here is $10." Apple to you potential buyer of iPod: "But, what about the perceived value and added value to your life and a change for the better in how the iPod does this and how it might save your life one day?" Your answer: "Fuck you here is $10 dollars for it." Boy, that woulda been great.

So, a cd of music or art or sound is now valued at $10 on the open market all because it made for easy math that one really bad day a few years back in Cupertino at Apple's HQ. Artists everywhere got screwed (again) and David Byrne, a legend is handing you the artist and music buying consumer the fucking proof. Will you believe it now?

Yet, artists new and old everywhere, and mini-record labels think iTunes is their potential savior and the way forward. You folks are as bad as the in a trance Radiohead fanbase!

Speaking of which, if I see that RADIOHEAD TELEVISION COMMERCIAL again with the mime's hands "trying" to fold up the DIY packaging of the physical cd released which was released today 01.01.08 to the physical earth I think I will fall over in hysterics as Radiohead fans want to tell me they are not still part of the big hit major record label machine?? WHO THE FUCK PAID FOR THOSE TV COMMERCIALS blasted around the universe last night on a pretty expensive night to buy tv ad time? THOM YORKE? Sure.

And now, full circle, we await what the deal will be between the geniuses at the Radiohead business empire and the Apple iTunes controlled distribution empire. Stay tuned. Someone should send in David Byrne to mediate that discussion.

December 31, 2007

Best of the Best ofs 2007 and Records You Probably Missed

Best of the "Best ofs" 2007 and Records You Probably Missed and Very Pretty Girls - PART I



Now, on with it, cause the blood hasn't even dried yet from my cat running across my face this morning and I am less than pleasantly unirritated. But, I guess that shocking wake-up call served as a final reminder from the universe that my ass shoulda been out of bed by 7am like everyone else working on New Years Eve. Now, mind you I went to bed at 3am... so, cut me some slack, I am still all rock'n'roll. On with it...

TOP No.1 RECORD YOU HAVEN'T LIKELY HEARD:

Taylor Mills, Lullagoodbye. Produced by Todd Sucherman, Scott Bennett

TOP No.2 RECORD YOU HAVEN'T LIKELY HEARD:

Taylor Mills, Lullagoodbye. Produced by Todd Sucherman, Scott Bennett

What do you get when you ask really big?

You get a down to earth girl next door singing on a stage to hundreds of thousands at Glastonbury or in Australia or in Japan on a stage with many of the finest musicians ever birthed, that you will ever be afforded to listen to.

You get someone who with all that - hasn't seemingly milked it to the point of losing herself or losing touch with the purpose and the gifts that may have gotten her to these amazing peaks and pinnacles thus far.

What you got in 2007 was a fantastic modern rock record that jumps boundaries of who should and could listen to it.

But, that is just what you get with a wonderful talent,  like Taylor Mills. She is America's real and only true American Idol... no smaltz (did I spell that right?) added, none needed, counter to other officially crowned Idols. And, my guess is she probably dances better than that other Taylor from Alabama Idol guy.

Taylor is America's true and only idol required in an age where all of those wasted phone calls amount to basically a well-packaged act that just rises and quickly fades away. Forgotten in the big hit machine. Unsustained. Unloved. They may crest with hit songs with hit superstar guitar players and move a million records (some do, some do not)... but, Taylor Mills, frankly has been singing with the best in the world for years already.

Go look at her photo collection, now this isn't arrogance on her part, I don't think she is capable. This is truth. Read her bio. This is a girl that took a dream to sing, straight from the undescript Midwest, and through sheer hard-work and determination made things happen.

She asked big and in return the universe answered equally as loud.

Now, lets get it out of the way right now --- she is absolutely stunning. But, here is what fascinates me about "this topic" is that some musical sub-cultures aka the lo-fi emo "I don't have a proverbial pot to piss in and I seemingly haven't washed my hair for days" attitude of some local scene indie rock types is that they would cast away someone working 1000% times as hard (as them) and who clearly within hearing 1 song has vocal chops for miles... for christ sakes, how could Brian Wilson be wrong? Read her bio.


(Phil Ramone is so so cute...)

Major music names in the business could get anyone to step into Ocean Way in L.A.and lay down background vocal tracks. But, "Noooooooo" indie rock peasants somehow know better. Or they give me the classic "but, I don't listen to that kind of music!" What kind, "like the really good kind?" (I think I stole that line from High Fidelity)

Why am I harping on this aspect? Cause didn't everybody's parent say the classic "don't judge a book by it's cover". I am speaking more of her 2007 first release and both the Top No.1 and No.2 Record You Haven't Likely Heard of 2007! Lullagoodbye.

Mind you, I could name reasons why I like the songs or various vocal parts and how she re-invented songs that were essentially 10 years old (like fine wine?) and breaths life and soul and heart and truth into them...

But, for me, what grabs me of course, is this record is a totally independent release, and this is a girl with pretty good connections who could of handed it and her career over to the majors. And I don't necessarily see her songs or the record getting piecemealed all over god's digital universe. I think I know why and I think it may have been pure choice, which started with a thought, and that is something any artist can make. (Thom Yorke did you know that?)

Lullagoodbye which for me is hands down a helluvagoodlisten. So, get over to TAYLORMILLSMUSIC.COM and gettadownandbuy it. I know that sounded slightly shmatzy or however the hell you spell it.

Let me end on this point. I have never met Taylor. I have just had brief conversations with her. But, she just comes across as honest and true and simple and pure in best of ways -- where the music she makes and the music she shares is done for the love of having a gift and wishing to share it with you. And how do I know this?

Well, you know how if you know someone with great credibility and who you would trust for days, who is just salt of the earth, and just a positive focused energy doing what they love and inspiring others and enjoying their life immensely in the process, and who radiates that type of positivity -- and say that person essentially recommends something to you or vouches for it... that is how I discovered Taylor Mills (and my amazingly toned and resonant for days Pearl Reference purple sparkley drum kit). I almost forgot to mention, the record was produced by this really lovely and "inspiring" guy Todd Suchermann.



(For the love of music, from the hearts of just um, plain, good people...)

Sorry, for the bad industry plugs above, but business is business, even in a 100% independent music business world. Sorry, need to be less subtle with those. Oh shit, and Scott Bennett produced, too.
;-)

May you find the truth in my words, and the simpleness of me just passing this forward and may you close the year with a great spectacular bash, and rediscover what is one of the most pleasing records I listened to in 2007.

Regardless, of it being "that type of music" ... aka the really really good kind from a really beautiful soul.

You can buy Taylor's record direct at
www.taylormillsmusic.com and read her bio and see some pretty cool down home photos at Taylor's mySpace page.

Also, she just recorded a lovely track that is the anthem for the day and the night that will float you into a big 2008! "New Year's Eve". You can add it your profile by clicking
here. It's up on her mySpace page... God bless her dedication and spirit and enjoy!

Check back for Part II of the Best of the "Best ofs" 2007 and Records You Probably Missed later today...

December 29, 2007

Bono of Food and why we care...

Bono of Food and why we care...



I have a friend, and for sake of argument, we will just call him, Bono. Bono makes food. Actually, he creates splendid things from no things. As far as I know, he isn't a CIA graduate, hell he might not even be a college graduate (god love him even more). As someone recently put it, "he uh, went, to the uh, school of hard knocks."

No matter. It's all heart on a sleeve, even down the sleeve into everything touched and created.

But, what Bono does with food for people is less about the sheer magnificience of how he etches this leftover bit and this bit from over here (as Bono does not work in a 5-star Manhattan eatery, he must mostly take what he can grab or declare as his) as it is about the love of people, giving, truly doing, and being consistently passionate about serving others through cooking food. Day in day out. Bono shows up to every gig, no matter his take from the day or night. Or the hours required.

People who love what they do and who they do it for -- do not call in sick.

Bono could be cooking with Kylie in Australia...

(please do not message me asking why Kylie is wearing a catsuit, sorry the video is so choppy, but in case you are wondering... it doesn't have a tail, I inspected it very closely so you wouldn't have to...)

... yum, or whipping up some new flavorful sound in the sticks of North Carolina, double yum, it really doesn't matter to him. He serves the good of people, and what is good for people and does it with flair and a sense of "this is the way you do this, it isn't done any other way" which to the Irish I guess is "arro-gant". The poor poor plight of the Irish. We adopted their less than appreciated son, and I get to be nourished deeply by someone who stands consistently as doing something that truly matters to the world, and can convince any of us to care about it's purpose and value. Truly at any cost.

Africa. We care.
Quality of food we ingest. We care.
Higher level of thinking and thought. We care.


It's end world hunger at any cost. It's the quality of what and why we ingest what we do at any cost. It's rise up each day and go forth above and beyond at any cost.

We create everything by way of our thoughts. We create heart and love through higher levels of thinking where our take (Thom Yorke are you listening?) doesn't have to equate out to the cost. No matter, if it's creating food, writing a song, or cherishing music or life or that special loved one thats buried deep within our soul forever.

And we can do it all as spectacularly and dazzling as we ask or wish. Bono just knows how to ask big. That is the only difference.



Why should we care about the food we eat and the music we listen to and why should we grow a deeper consiciousnesses around both?

Because deeply embedded within both their cores... that is after you strip away the corporate muck, the layers of distribution fat, the payoffs and deal making, raise lower levels of thought in support of less than globally profitable ventures or ideas... is an energizing inherent sustainability that can give rise to each of us having what we need to not only show up to work everyday, but do the right work needed, for the good of all, to carry us all forward, to a new and bigger and even brighter day.

That is the opportunity that has presented itself for the business of music in a digital universe comprised of Steve Jobs, iPods,
stalwart record labels from Warner to EMI who are still-standing-yet-crumbling, getting-their-digital-rights-asses-together, in 1-last-desperate-attempt-to-still-control-the-future, and bad ideas from reputated electro-rock bands that devalued the price of a song from the already paltry .99 cents to nothing and gave the stalwarts essentially "more time". If we think bigger with a higher level of thought, music can be saved.

So, next time you steal a song for .99 cents, and after you
mind-numbingly shuffle it around in your sea of 2,000 plus mostly ripped songs, you may as well hit the McDonald's dollar menu drive-thru as that would be the comparable nourishment for that level of thought. All that is required here is thought. It isn't that difficult.

All of us, yes, even you, Thom Yorke, can be a Bono of something spectacularly big world changing and extraordinary. We each already have our stage. it is up to us to determine how best we make use of it.

Bono god bless you. Both of you.

December 28, 2007

Truth: Billy Loves Greenbeans. And he loves you, too.

Truth: Billy Loves Greenbeans. And he loves you, too.



For all practical purposes, I grew up in Chicago. My acquired accent is clearly Chicago, so much so, that folks always ask or assume I am a true Chicagoan. I spent a decade in that wonderous town, and just in the nick of time. I caught Chicago in one of it's more recent musical upswings, and when I was landing (actually I drove there) in Chicago -- a little band called The Smashing Pumpkins was about to take-off and sell 500,000 copies of it's very first little record. The town was abuzz in music industry mogul sightings (however, Thom Yorke was not spotted) and much was going on... we had Liz Phair playing Heartland Cafe, Wicker Park rejuvenating into a better dumpier place (for music), Urge Overkill, and a few years later -- we had those wonderful Seether girls, mmmmh, yum. Jesus Lizard, Ministry, Material Issue, the list from 90's Chicago goes on and on...

There are few things I truly know, like as in know in my heart, like layered in between my layers of musical and human flesh. One of those things is the truth that inspired and still inspires Billy and Jimmy of The Pumpkins. Not only are they in it to write songs, be musicians, and stick with it over all these years for the same very reasons that got them into it in the first place. What I know is that they really love you. Through drugs and drink, and deaths. They re-dedicate themselves to a true higher calling and purpose to create and play and serve you great music. They never left little-town Chicago really, as the band never really left.

2007 saw them re-assert themselves as musicians in Smashing Pumpkins and to record great records for another 20 years. They evolve and grow and really have always put it out there - that is their hearts to anyone who bothered to listen and/or care. In this, through the years, and recounting how they were back then, this has been not for their own commercial gain or to be great innovators or have a relationship based on music industry secrets. Nor, otherwise create something that would allow tricks to be played on those they adore and love, as you do them. For that would never suffice as a relationship or partnership Billy in particular would stand for or see the point in having.

And, when you see the light, it is easier to see the light of someone else.

Here is what Billy wrote over the Holidays:


Portions reprinted via Billy Corrigan's Blog... Go read it or read below ;-)

December 18, 2007 - Dear Big Bright Lights in the Night Sky...

Since the holidays are upon us, the collective I would like to take this opportunity to give gratitude where it is due, and that is to those that are not hypnotized, or so numbed by darkness that they cannot hear the chime in my words...I wish you a warm holiday and a brilliant New Year to come, and may you get all you deserve! (again) From my heart to yours, sincerely, I hope you feel the love that we have for all of you, even for those of you who are lost and seeking, bruised and still keeping...i hope these words find you as well...

The new day has finally come as we turn the corner on the end of one energy that no longer serves us and begin to embrace the new dawn that will...and no, I am not speaking about the band or the music business...what is past is passed, and we all wear the black arm bands in honor of, but life happily, as it should, marches on...hopefully to a good beat...

Thanks to New Orleans for showing Us the meaning of hope...and thanks to the old guard for showing the same dull move, you know the one that never works? Art band that said old guard wishes they were in so bad that they wish importance upon it? Check! No matter what you crutches all dream up, Led Zep is still a 100 times better! Go Zep! Go Team! Rock on! Long Live the Mighty SP!
And...

Thank YOU for showing up! And yes, I mean YOU :)

lovingness, happiness, BC

December 27, 2007

Like music? Read this Jon Brion interview

Like music? Read this Jon Brion interview.



Portions reprinted via Chicago's Daily Herald... Go read it


These are about the most honest words on artists, songs, the industry, and doing what you love. Jon Brion doesn't mean to be a hero, he just does what he does. He has figured the way to make the current day music industry work for him -- not against him. He has figured out how to do what he loves in a sea of people doing everything required to stumble along hoping and wishing and doctoring a way forward.

Who is he? Read the interview below.

But, I gave up my Jon Brion New Year's eve tickets to a lovely and excited Kelsey in Chicago today. What could be nicer than to give the gift of music? I don't know - giving someone crystal wood chimes? They are pretty amazing, too. Anyhow, it's ok, helping feed someone else's musical cravings is almost as good as feeding my own.

This will most likely be Jon's only 2008 performance outside of the Los Angeles metro area probably for all of next year.

If you can jet off to Chicago, there are tickets left for his New Year's eve double-show. Open bar included at one of the most beautiful acoustically-correct facilities in the country. When Jon goes out to play -- he does it with style and surely Kelsey and others afterward will be motivated to get out to our beloved L.A. and catch Jon at his standing gig at Largo.

Now, go read the interview. :-) Happy Happy.





Jon Brion steps in and out of the studio
By Mark Guarino | Chicago Daily Herald Music Critic

Jon Brion wears multiple hats -- producer, songwriter, multi-instrumentalist, engineer, film composer -- but the one that connects them all is the most simple: Music geek.

In a business that prefers reliable franchises to risk-taking and one-note stars over adventuresome mavericks, Brion is an anomaly. He earned his reputation as a producer who helped massage career-making albums out of artists like Fiona Apple, Kanye West and Aimee Mann among many others. Brion, 44, does not arrived armed with a trademark sound; instead, like old school producers ranging from George Martin to Jim Dickinson, Brion earns his paycheck by becoming an advocate for the song, introducing a full spectrum of sonic possibilities from his encyclopedic music background, and seeing how they fly in the studio. An obsessive instrument collector and enthusiast, he is also capable of making what someone hears in their head come alive by just sitting down and playing.

He is also a one-man band, which will be in full display at the two sets he will perform New Year's Eve at the Harris Theater in Millennium Park. Brion, who first started playing music in Boston and records his own music sporadically, first faced Chicago audiences at the Intonation Music Festival two summers back. Looping each instrument one-by-one, he succeeded in creating, with just his two hands, the dense and melodic kick of a full rock band. It's a method of performing that made his long-time weekly residency at Largo, the Los Angeles club, legendary.

Last week, Brion talked, from his studio in L.A., about his obsessions. What follows is an edited transcript of our conversation.

Q: Two summers ago at Intonation, Chicago audiences had what was really one of the only times to see you perform.

A: The fact I never leave L.A. has certainly an impact on that! (laughs)

Q: Was that one of the first times transferring what you do at a small club to a larger audience?

A: Yeah but, you know, it's funny: What I do at Largo is a by-product of a friend owning a place I like the atmosphere of and where people are paying attention to music. And years ago them going, "hey, you should do this every week." I was at a point I didn't want to tour. I didn't and still don't like the most of the trappings of promotion. I think most people who join rock bands, their desire is to be rock star more than actually the joy of performing. Performing is something you can do because you get attention from it and it garners all this other stuff. I like the act in itself. And what Largo has provided for me I play about 50 shows a year and I don't have to go on tour. It's kind of amazing. I play as many shows as a lot of friends of mine who tour and am probably more well known. But I just found this place I like and I do it and people show up and they're always there and I'm always there. It's not as if it's designed as a small thing. In fact, it's even kind of funny. I'm the only thing that plays at Largo that, at any given moment, is as loud and abrasive as a My Bloody Valentine show! (laughs) Kevin shields and I have more in common that is comfortable.

Q: So Chicago gave you an opportunity to take the large show and put it, finally, in a large setting.

A: And that sounded like a good thing. The other thing that happened: I absolutely fell in love with Chicago. I have this crazy love affair with your town. And I'm beginning to feel like it might be the last city in America that actually has its own atmosphere. That has its own tonality. That has its own special thing. There used to be more cities that felt more special in and of itself. But as we go into the Home Depot era of every block has the same store … You know, I love Los Angeles as much as many people think it's a sprawling piece of (expletive), I think it's a sprawling piece of potential. But architecturally, they knocked down all good (expletive) and put up rectangles. Chicago hasn't done that. It has beautiful, modern things competitive with any city on the planet and they're intermingled them with beautiful older things. I wish New York still had its sense of city but Manhattan, it's not even a shell of itself. All it has is tall buildings. But when you're walking around on the street there's nothing else.

Q: People in Chicago still go out to see music. That's not the case in many cities.

A: Yeah, it seems like that to me. It seems like people (in Chicago) remember it's something you can do, that it's entertaining to hear one human being make sound and put themselves on the line. I've noticed this for years. Even when I played with other people: if you play in a bunch of towns and you're out for a few weeks, if you get to Chicago there are twice as many people showing up at those gigs and they're twice as attentive. It just seems like that hasn't changed. Seattle had that for while. Chicago seems to have always had it and never lost it. And you guys had it in the in jazz era. Your (expletive) town is just as important as New York. People who came out of there are unbelievable. And I get it because people were showing up when somebody good was playing. You seem to be keeping up the legacy. Which I have to admit is pretty attractive to me.

Q: You perform as a one-man band, looping all the instruments live. It's fascinating to watch you build the sound. Is playing strictly solo still something you want to continue to do?

A: I want to do more of that at this point. Elvis Costello used to do this thing when he bothered to descend on New York back in his heyday. Where he parked at a theater, it was the time of (his 1986 album) "Blood and Chocolate," and he was doing the spinning songbook. Someone like me relates to that immensely. But the other thing he was doing was every night was, he had a different band. Like, one night it would be Jim Keltner and Mitchell Froom, the next night the Attractions, the next night it would be completely solo. You didn't even know. You bought the ticket because you wanted to see him. And every single gig was its own unique thing. I heard that he also used to do a thing where he'd pull into town and go to (the country music club) Lonestar and do George Jones covers and stuff from (his 1981 album of country covers) "Almost Blue" and then he'd play the Ritz with the Attractions and then show up at the Blue Note and sing some standards with a jazz musician. To me that's the right ideA: Maximize what the place is about. Chicago's a place that has all these interesting assets. There's so many talented people there, which makes it fascinating to me.

I'm a total fan of instruments. And a lot of instrument manufacturers, the great ones in America, were in Chicago. A couple of trips ago I actually went out to the building where the Deagan factory was. They used to make vibraphones. Vibraphones were a huge part of my life. I went to talk to this guy who repairs them and he was incredibly sweet. I got this beautiful history lesson. And I learned a ton. I learned about old man Deagan, all this amazing (expletive) … To me, to be able to do that instead of going in a van -- you ask if I'm interested in playing to a bunch of people? -- the answer is "yeah." Here's the problem: I'm not interested in getting in the van and going to Chicago and then to the next town I'm supposed to play because I need to build up an audience. And why do you want to build up an audience? To make more money, sell more product, play as many places as you can in a short period of time until you have nervous exhaustion. And then you need to recover, but at that point you're on that treadmill. I'd rather just go to Chicago, Seattle, San Francisco or New York and spend my off days doing things that will feed my brain rather than be that person who just, for the sake of success, is going to play as many gigs as possible but all I saw on the day of my gig was the van.

Any of these nights I played in Chicago, I had two of the best meals of my life. I walked around and saw a city that still had personality and I soaked it in and maybe went on an instrument hunt. And I'm all excited because not only did I get some nice food, not only was I inspired, not only did I feel a sense of place, maybe I might have a new instrument that night that I never used before. And I'm going to use that in front of people, which is going to cause me to do things I hadn't done previously. I mean, that's so much better than getting out of van and the roadie sets up things the exactly same way from the night before and you're totally tired because you didn't sleep enough or you had to wake up early to travel to the next town.

The only reason to do that is the belief that that's the only way you have a career. Which, so far, as far I'm concerned, I've proved isn't remotely necessarily. So why change now?

In terms of my desire to playing for people? I love that part. That part is absolutely pure and great. But I also want people to get a chance to see something different. So I don't want to put myself in a position where you're doing things by rote.

Q: Was producing a way to get you off the road?

A: To be quite honest it was never intentional. I've been playing instruments as far back as I have memories. And also I was playing with tape recorders as far as I have memories. Anything that made sound was a beautiful, playful thing … It still being exciting for me, Nothing I had done was an intentional move to get to where some people see as some other area working in music. It's all one area.

Q: As someone who works with major label stars, is it becoming more difficult considering that the business side of things seems to be fractured more than ever?

A: The record business has always been troubling to me. This is not a new thing. The thing that is new is that the public has a consciousness that that plays a part. The musicians have been complaining for years. Now everybody is realizing, "wait a minute, what the (expletive) is this?" Consumers realize it because they are hearing more homogenous music and going, "why does that have to be?" The truth is, artists play a big part of that. Artists so want the prize, that it's not just record companies (saying) it needs to be slick, I see artist doing things left and right making sure it works. Because they're so afraid they're not going to be able to make their next record, they stock this record with things that they think people will like. It's all going to collapse under its own weight as it's obviously already started to. And that's a good thing.

Q: What do you predict will happen?

A: You know what? It's going to be fine. And the fact of the matter is, it's going to be good for music because eventually more and more people aren't going to wait for subsidies from a record company to make to make a record. And we're going to have this horrible amount of unforgivable (expletive) that's going to be on the Internet. Because of every person who thinks they should be making sound in front of people are going to put their thing up. There's going to be glut of crap to go through. But the occasional thing that is just great and humans respond to, is going to get through. And those records will get made. The other thing is, the music business will never be gone. It's going to change, it's going to get a lot smaller, maybe they won't be able to police the money off the internet which will upset them to no end. But artists don't like dealing with business. So at some point somebody is going to say, "I'm going to take 20 percent of what you make but I'm going to do all business stuff." And the artists are going to say yes. There's always going to be a Col. Tom Parker.

Q: Do make choices based on the artist's integrity as you see it?

A: Everything plays a part. It's dangerous to use words like "integrity" because it's all subjective. For some reason something comes up at a particular time and I feel it could be something real or it's something I'm interested in. And that can be anything. It can be: I'm interested in person's spirit. It can be: "(expletive), I think these songs are so good I don't want to somebody to make a chumped-up record of them." It can be somebody who I actually know people are currently overlooking, it's somebody people have an impression of and it's like, "you know what? This person is much richer and more diverse than people's impressions of them. And I want to get that across." The only thing in common is, I guess, that I said yes in each case. In truth, why that really is, maybe I don't even know … Something makes me see that there's value in the fact that having me doing it is going to be more worthwhile to them than if they went to somebody else. And that feeling engenders in me that it's something real. Regardless of perception. If I operated on perception, I wouldn't have done probably most of the things I do. Like, "oh, I can't do that because it's not underground or cool enough." So that's the standard thing I do. People don't always realize that disregarding popular things is just another form of prejudice.

Q: Does having a household name a producer prevent you from working with artists who aren't as well known?

A: I'd work with anybody I'd say yes to. As confusing as that sounds. It's all about the person, the work at hand, the circumstance, what I've done thus far in my life, where I'm at, at that moment. I constantly get people who come to me because they heard something I'd done that they want to co-opt. What they don't realize is, that's the combination of another artist and myself. If I see that or I smell that, the "yes" goes away really fast. If somebody calls and says, "oh, I like this album" and they go on and on about it. Yeah that's fine, but that's that artist, that's not me. Don't think I did everything. I think that's a bit of a misinformed thing that I don't blame people for. Because on a lot of records, I do a lot of different jobs. So people assume I am somebody who's imposing a sound. And it's like no, that's a different person with a different batch of songs at a different time. And they came in and that's what we made together.

Q: Which I assume is how it worked with Kanye West.

A: Yeah, I'd been waiting for years to do some sort of thing within hip-hop. There were certain things I'd been doing for years that I really felt were loop-influenced. I didn't really like when people were using machines to ape a certain sound. A drum program is interesting but now I want to hear two drummers doing that live. And I'll record it in a way that's not a standard machine sound. There's a lot of influence on the second Fiona Apple record, drum and bass, but I wanted it to be organic and seamless with the songs. And she listened to lot of hip-hop but she didn't want to sound like she was aping anything. So the Kanye thing, he was the first person who called … But he wasn't calling me because he said, "hey, I heard your stuff and I can tell you have your ears on." He heard the movie stuff I did. And he wanted to get something cinematic. And he was looking around at hip-hop and -- here's where he's great -- and said, well (expletive), I can already provide everything that's necessary for hip-hop as it stands. I know how to program I know how to sample, I know how to produce, I know how to write. He went looking for somebody who was doing other things. He came to me because of orchestration and then discovered that I was obsessed with audio and mics and that I could play a bunch of instruments and then that became the connection. And again, it's not like I did a bunch of hip-hop tracks that came to the attraction of somebody who did hip-hop. I found another likeminded person who wanted to make hybrid music who knew about an aspect of me that they wanted to co-opt. And for my perspective, I could say yes because it was like, "oh good, I can finally work with someone who is working in a completely different arena, that is not a singer-songwriter and is somebody who is passionate about the work." That's an easy yes.

Q: You've worked on so many great albums, is there one that's a benchmark for you personally?

A: I can't say because for me, it's dangerous to talk about because I think people need to listen and choose what resonates with them in a real way. For me, if you were to ask about projects: on every record I've ever done there's something on it that I'm incredibly proud of that went better than I could ever imagined. On every record I've ever done, there's something on it that if it was playing and we were both in the room, you would see me cringing and apologizing … Every record. And on every record there is some segment of music that I think is beautiful and conceptionally touches like twenty different points at once. And it's emotional and it has thought in it. And half the time I look at people when that moment is going on and they're like, "eh, that was cool." To be honest with you, that's like my whole career.

Q: You're closer to the source so you're the only one hearing it.

A: There is stuff I find beautiful in each of them. Genuinely. It might just be the bridge of the song … There's so many different variations. For the most part the writing isn't an issue because most of the people I work with I believe in as writers. Everyone I worked with is a real writer. Often it's been other people who didn't know that. And that was my aim with as a project: "Hey, you should know this person's serious." But in retrospect? If we sat there, I might go, "Hey I think those eight bars is good as anything I've ever heard." Especially if you're asking about my contribution. Occasionally I get eight bars that are really, really good. Most of the time I'll tell you what's wrong. (laughs)


Jon Brion and Friends
When:
9 p.m. Dec. 31
Where: Harris Theater at Millennium Park, 205 E. Randolph St., Chicago
Tickets: $85. Includes pre- and post-show parties with open bar. Call (312) 334-7777 or visit www.harristheaterchicago.org